3/22/2021 0 Comments Amd Fx 8150 Benchmark
Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green).The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money.The Zambezi and Phenom based processors were overclocked to 4.2Ghz for a fair benchmarking session since both come at Different Stock frequencies.
The Bulldozer CPU used here falls under the B2 revision which fixes the performance bug noticed in the earlier revisions. While in the MultiThreaded applications such as games, Bulldozer shines. We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. Id really like to see the performance of the 4- and 6- before making judgement. However it is useful to look at both CPU and GPU bound scenarios to paint an accurate picture of how well a CPU handles game workloads, as well as what sort of performance you can expect in present day titles. Weve seen this in the past where one platform will hold an advantage over another in a GPU bound scenario and its always tough to explain. Within each family however there is no advantage to a faster CPU, everything is just GPU bound. The FX-8150 is thankfully a bit faster than its predecessors, but it still falls behind Sandy Bridge. Under more real world GPU bound settings however, Bulldozer looks just fine. Megatexture works by dynamically taking texture data from disk and constructing texture tiles for the engine to use, a major component for allowing ids developers to uniquely texture the game world. However because of the heavy use of unique textures (id says the original game assets are over 1TB), id needed to get creative on compressing the games textures to make them fit within the roughly 20GB the game was allotted. Amd Fx 8150 Benchmark Code The TextureAs a consequence whenever you load a texture, Rage needs to transcode the texture from its storage codec to S3TC on the fly. This is a constant process throughout the entire game and this transcoding is a significant burden on the CPU. Thus when you run vtbenchmark 8, for example, it will benchmark from 1 to 8 threads (the default appears to depend on the CPU you have). Since transcoding is done by the CPU this is a pure CPU benchmark. I present the best case transcode time at the maximum number of concurrent threads each CPU can handle. Both are faster than Intels 2500K, but not quite as good as the 2600K. If you want to see how performance scales with thread count, check out the chart below. Performance, especially in gaming, seems to be pretty horrible. I was all about AMD last year, but early this year I picked up an i5 2500K and was blown away by efficiency and performance even in a hobbled H67. Its not that Bulldozer is terrible (because it isnt); Sandy Bridge is just a phenom. If SB had just been a little faster than Lynnfield, it would still be fast. AMD has Bulldozer, an inconsistent performer that is better in some areas and worse in others, but has a hard time competing with its own forebearer. Its still an unusual product that some people will really benefit from and some wont. The demise of the Phenom II cant come soon enough for AMD as some people will look at the benchmarks and conclude that a super cheap X4 955BE is a much better value than BD. I hope it isnt seen that way, but its not a difficult conclusion to reach. Perhaps BD is more forward looking, and the other octocore will be cheaper than the 8150 so its a better value.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |